Important links
Abstract
Democracy takes effort, and these efforts do not always benefit one’s own political side. Across two preregistered studies (total N = 916), we used computational modeling of effortful behavior to measure US partisans’ motivation to strengthen democratic engagement in rural (traditionally Republican-leaning), urban (traditionally Democratic-leaning), or all US areas. Study 1 showed that participants were generally willing to make pro-democratic efforts, but less so when efforts benefited out-group areas, particularly among more affectively polarized participants. We hypothesized that this asymmetry is sustained by misperceptions about out-partisans’ willingness to engage in cross-partisan pro-democratic efforts. Study 2 showed that most participants (87%) underestimated out-party effort willingness. Importantly, correcting this misperception increased motivation to support out-group areas without significantly reducing in-group motivation. These findings suggest that cross-partisan pro-democratic motivation is common but partly obscured by misperceptions about out-partisans’ willingness, and that making this willingness visible might help sustain the collective effort democracy depends on.
Citation
@misc{borghi2026democracy,
title = {When Democracy Is Worth the Effort: {{Seeing}} the Other Side as Willing Strengthens Pro-Democratic Motivation},
author = {Borghi, Olaf and Tsakiris, Manos and {von Mohr}, Mariana},
year = {2026},
publisher = {PsyArXiv},
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/9jf8s_v3},
keywords = {democracy, effort, computational modeling, misperceptions, partisanship}
}